 |
Business As Usual
Like all commercial enterprises, a consulting firm’s continued viability
depends upon its success in generating revenues and minimizing costs in
order to turn a profit. Typically, consulting firms have their own
growth and revenue as a significant part of their agenda. It is
common practice to compensate employees in consulting businesses for
sales – both the first sale that occurs with a new prospect and any
second sales that may occur as follow-on work beyond the original
contract. Likewise, employees' ascent up the company hierarchy depends
in part on their success in sales. Just like other businesses,
consulting firms seek to minimize costs. For instance, many consulting
firms use a leveraged business model where more experienced and senior
level people sell and manage work later serviced by junior employees.
The partner focuses on growing the business while the leveraged use of
associates reduces internal operating costs. Junior associates know that
attaining the desirable position of partner ultimately requires
demonstrated success in initial and second sales. For every ten
beginning consultants hired, few will be retained long-term. Those
fortunate few on the track to partner status may feel pressure from
conflicting demands. For instance, how can they take the time to grow
the business and simultaneously mentor internal associates? In
addition, some consulting firms develop standardized products or
methodologies in an attempt to meet client needs and, at the same time,
carve out a market niche. Their standardized approach has the added
benefit of minimizing costly customization and not reinventing the wheel
for each new client. Such consulting companies usually deal with large,
complex projects that generate long-term involvement and sizeable fees.
Clients buy expert knowledge translated into standard methodologies with
clearly defined deliverables, a detailed project plan, and consultants
to do the work for them. |
 |
In contrast, some consulting firms
prefer to do the work with, not for, the client. These firms typically
have fewer standard products. Instead, they offer a process whereby
client and consultant mutually discover issues and together create
solutions that typically use both client and consulting company
employees in the delivery of that solution. While offering some standard
products, such firms inject more customization into their client work.
Rather than emphasizing standard methodologies, they assess needs and
design interventions specific to a particular client. However, even
these firms recognize the financial benefit of at least some
standardized products and processes. So, where’s the rub? So far, it
sounds as if consulting firms are employing typical, widely accepted
business practices. What complicates the issue is the nature of the
relationship formed between consultants and their clients.
Relationships Based on Trust
When seeking outside help from a consultant, prospective clients often
feel a degree of vulnerability, not only for themselves but also for
their business. They usually have experienced many anxious moments that
led them to conclude, “I have a problem.” It’s an especially sobering
moment when they conclude that “it’s a problem I can’t fix on my own.”
For some, the use of a consultant takes on less personal overtones such
as when the company opts for new technology or a new business approach.
In these circumstances, seeking consulting help is no reflection on the
individual. Nonetheless, the client often is playing catch-up with
consultant’s savvy in areas new to the client. Dependent on the
consultant’s experience and knowledge, the client plays neophyte to the
consultant’s role as expert. Once the consultants leave, the client will
have to tend to an organization inconvenienced by changes and employees
fearful of how the changes will impact them. Once again, a degree of
vulnerability exists for the client. The above scenarios all assume a
client in need of help and a consultant with the skills and willingness
to help. Based on this implicit promise to help, clients trust that
consultants have their best interests at heart and that they undertake
work for the client’s ultimate benefit.
<< go to page
1 | go to page 3 >> |
 |