 |
Market-Focused Strategy
and Structure
The ability to anticipate changes in the market and competitive landscape is crucial to effective
long-term strategic planning. Changes in the contextual environment must be balanced with
long-term objectives and internal capabilities to determine new areas of investment for the
business. Many companies currently refreshing their strategic plans anticipate important
changes to the market and competitive landscape ahead. This expectation is forcing renewed
emphasis on the stage of the strategic planning process that we call “Strategic Choices” – those
choices about how to achieve the large Strategic Objectives. One such choice that is rising
to the top, in some sectors, is the decision to migrate toward market-segment focused strategies
and structures.
The Clarion Group has identified four inputs that are critical to such transformations.
Many businesses neglect one or more of these inputs, producing either outright failure or
unnecessary delay in their evolution to the new strategy and structure. These roadblocks
can be anticipated and avoided by deploying a systematic planning approach at the outset
of the effort.
Opportunity and Challenge
The cross-industry trend toward tighter alignment with market segments is especially evident in the insurance
business. Traditional insurance products have become commodities while new products are quickly and
readily replicated by others. Constrained growth opportunities and squeezed margins have forced many
insurance companies to consider new approaches to gaining market share and growing shareholder value.
One such approach is to differentiate on the basis of customer experience. In a commoditized
product environment, such things as ease of access, customer friendly billing, and timeliness
of commission payments become important levers in acquiring new customers and channel partners.
Close strategic and structural alignment with specific market segments is the means to build
those levers in the business. That focus also drives diversification of the total book, enabling
the enterprise to absorb the business cycles that may vary by segment. |
 |
The challenge in all this is finding the right balance between
offering a differentiated value proposition (by investing in internal competencies from product
creation to pre-sale service to post-sale service to ongoing retention) and maintaining a
cost-to-value equation that fits the markets being served. Finding that balance requires
careful consideration of a broad set of variables. Companies that understand which variables
are most critical to their own transition will be first to capitalize on the opportunities
posed by a market-focused strategy and structure. That’s where the Migrating to Market
Segments framework comes in.
Making the Move
In our work with insurance clients, we have encountered a number of efforts to migrate to a more market-focused
strategy and structure. In most cases, the conversation among top executives focuses on one area or
another of the total work that must be done. One company, as noted above, started with the notion of
differentiating around the customer experience. Another started with the idea of restructuring business
lines around the fastest-growing market segments.
Still another started with an internal focus; the executive team asked the question, “with
which of our customer segments can we differentiate ourselves, given our internal resources
and capabilities?”
Each of these companies has invested significant time and resources in becoming more customer
and market focused. While none of them to date would describe themselves as “fully
successful” in achieving their objectives, it is a relatively straightforward matter
to predict which of them will most fully realize the goal of a market-segment focused strategy
and structure. The key will be the extent to which they have considered and satisfied four
essential inputs to the transformation. The four inputs include 1) Define the Segments 2)
Design the Customer Experience 3) Create the Brand Army and 4) Create the Enabling Structures.
<< Back to The Insights |
go to page 2 >> |
 |